The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment
BACKGROUND The number of existing wrinkle assessment scales makes it difficult to compare the efficacy of cosmetic techniques in rejuvenating photoaged skin. A single and simple assessment scale that reliably quantifies wrinkle depth is needed. OBJECTIVE The objective was to validate the Modified Fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatologic surgery 2008-06, Vol.34 (s1), p.S85-S91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND
The number of existing wrinkle assessment scales makes it difficult to compare the efficacy of cosmetic techniques in rejuvenating photoaged skin. A single and simple assessment scale that reliably quantifies wrinkle depth is needed.
OBJECTIVE
The objective was to validate the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS) as a nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment tool.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
The MFWS comprises three main classes, in which definitions are based on a set of reference photographs and descriptions, and three interclasses, in which definitions are based only on descriptions. Assessors were trained to apply this scale to volunteers and study patients by using photographs of nasolabial wrinkles either alone or with descriptions. Inter‐ and intraassessment reliability coefficients were calculated using weighted kappa statistics.
RESULTS
In patients, the combined intraassessor reliability from both sides of the face was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.74) when only photographs were used and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76–0.82) when descriptions were added. Interassessor reliability for the photographs alone was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62–0.68) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69–0.79) for photographs plus descriptions.
CONCLUSIONS
The MFWS is a reliable method for quantitative assessment of nasolabial skin folds, with good inter‐ and intraassessor reliability. Including descriptions with the photographs increased reliability. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-0512 1524-4725 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34248.x |