Prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer palliative care: a prospective randomised study

Goals The objective of this study was to determine utility of prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer patients hospitalised for palliative care in a specialised centre. Materials and methods Prospective 1:1 open randomised study was designed. Twenty patients aged 55 to 88 years with advanced cancer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2008-07, Vol.16 (7), p.847-852
Hauptverfasser: Weber, Catherine, Merminod, Thierry, Herrmann, François R., Zulian, Gilbert B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Goals The objective of this study was to determine utility of prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer patients hospitalised for palliative care in a specialised centre. Materials and methods Prospective 1:1 open randomised study was designed. Twenty patients aged 55 to 88 years with advanced cancer and an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months were assigned to either receive treatment with 2,850/3,800 U ( 70 kg) of daily subcutaneous nadroparin or no treatment. Suspicion of venous thrombo-embolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) was confirmed by echo-Doppler examination of the lower limbs and/or by spiral computed tomography scan of the lungs. Bleeding episodes were recorded. Platelet count was measured on days 7 and 14. Survival time from study entry was determined. Main results One venous thrombo-embolism and one major bleeding occurred in the group receiving nadroparin, whereas two minor bleedings occurred in the control group. At 3 months, nine of ten participants had died in the control group vs five of ten in the group receiving nadroparin ( P  = 0.141). Five participants could be discharged home ( P  = 0.141). Conclusions Decision to administer prophylactic nadroparin in hospitalised cancer patients under palliative care remains a challenge. Better mobility score at admission and the likelihood to be discharged home may be useful for practical purposes. The observation of a potential influence of prophylactic nadroparin on survival deserves further studies.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-007-0339-3