Prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer palliative care: a prospective randomised study
Goals The objective of this study was to determine utility of prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer patients hospitalised for palliative care in a specialised centre. Materials and methods Prospective 1:1 open randomised study was designed. Twenty patients aged 55 to 88 years with advanced cancer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2008-07, Vol.16 (7), p.847-852 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Goals
The objective of this study was to determine utility of prophylactic anti-coagulation in cancer patients hospitalised for palliative care in a specialised centre.
Materials and methods
Prospective 1:1 open randomised study was designed. Twenty patients aged 55 to 88 years with advanced cancer and an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months were assigned to either receive treatment with 2,850/3,800 U ( 70 kg) of daily subcutaneous nadroparin or no treatment. Suspicion of venous thrombo-embolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) was confirmed by echo-Doppler examination of the lower limbs and/or by spiral computed tomography scan of the lungs. Bleeding episodes were recorded. Platelet count was measured on days 7 and 14. Survival time from study entry was determined.
Main results
One venous thrombo-embolism and one major bleeding occurred in the group receiving nadroparin, whereas two minor bleedings occurred in the control group. At 3 months, nine of ten participants had died in the control group vs five of ten in the group receiving nadroparin (
P
= 0.141). Five participants could be discharged home (
P
= 0.141).
Conclusions
Decision to administer prophylactic nadroparin in hospitalised cancer patients under palliative care remains a challenge. Better mobility score at admission and the likelihood to be discharged home may be useful for practical purposes. The observation of a potential influence of prophylactic nadroparin on survival deserves further studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00520-007-0339-3 |