Intestinal and hepatic response to combined partial hepatectomy and small bowel resection in mice

Background: Both partial-hepatectomy (PHx) and massive small bowel resection (SBR) are strong mitogenic signals to the remnant liver and intestine, respectively. This study tested the hypothesis that PHx was an additive signal for intestinal adaptation after massive SBR. Methods: Male mice underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2002-04, Vol.183 (4), p.435-440
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Lindsey A, O’Brien, David P, Kemp, Christopher J, Williams, Jodi L, Dunke-Jacobs, Erik, Erwin, Christopher R, Warner, Brad W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Both partial-hepatectomy (PHx) and massive small bowel resection (SBR) are strong mitogenic signals to the remnant liver and intestine, respectively. This study tested the hypothesis that PHx was an additive signal for intestinal adaptation after massive SBR. Methods: Male mice underwent either sham SBR or 50% proximal SBR. Mice from these two groups were then subjected to a 70% PHx or sham PHx. After 3 days, parameters of intestinal adaptation and liver regeneration were recorded in the remnant intestine and liver, respectively. Results: Intestinal adaptation following SBR occurred normally, but was not enhanced after concomitant PHx. On the other hand, SBR impaired the regenerative ability of the liver following PHx. Conclusions: Intestinal adaptation after SBR takes priority over liver regeneration after PHx. These data implicate a hierarchy with regard to adaptive alterations to organ loss and endorse an important role for the intestinal mucosa in the regulation of hepatic regeneration.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00809-7