A replicable method for blood glucose control in critically Ill patients

CONTEXT:To ensure interpretability and replicability of clinical experiments, methods must be adequately explicit and should elicit the same decision from different clinicians who comply with the study protocol. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine whether clinician compliance with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2008-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1787-1795
Hauptverfasser: Morris, Alan H, Orme, James, Truwit, Jonathon D, Steingrub, Jay, Grissom, Colin, Lee, Kang H, Li, Guoliang L, Thompson, B Taylor, Brower, Roy, Tidswell, Mark, Bernard, Gordon R, Sorenson, Dean, Sward, Katherine, Zheng, Hui, Schoenfeld, David, Warner, Homer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:CONTEXT:To ensure interpretability and replicability of clinical experiments, methods must be adequately explicit and should elicit the same decision from different clinicians who comply with the study protocol. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine whether clinician compliance with protocol recommendations exceeds 90%. DESIGN:We developed an adequately explicit computerized protocol (eProtocol-insulin) for managing critically ill adult patient blood glucose. We monitored clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations in four intensive care units in four hospitals and compared blood glucose distributions with those of a simple clinical guideline at one hospital and a paper-based protocol at another. All protocols and the guideline used intravenous insulin and 80 to 110 mg/dL (4.4–6.1 mmol/L) blood glucose targets. SETTING:The setting for this study was four academic hospital intensive care units. PATIENTS:This study included critically ill adults requiring intravenous insulin. INTERVENTION:Intervention used in this study was a bedside computerized protocol for managing blood glucose. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:The main outcome measure was clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations. RESULTS:The number of patients was 31 to 458 and the number of blood glucose measurements was 2,226 to 19,925 among the four intensive care units. Clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations was 91% to 98%. Blood glucose distributions were similar in the four hospitals (generalized linear model p = .18). Compared with the simple guideline, eProtocol-insulin glucose measurements within target increased from 21% to 39%, and mean blood glucose decreased from 142 to 115 mg/dL (generalized linear model p < .001). Compared with the paper-based protocol, eProtocol-insulin glucose measurements within target increased from 28% to 42%, and mean blood glucose decreased from 134 to 116 mg/dL (generalized linear model p = .001). CONCLUSIONS:The 91% to 98% clinician compliance indicates eProtocol-insulin is an exportable instrument that can establish a replicable experimental method for clinical trials of blood glucose management in critically ill adults. Control of blood glucose was better with eProtocol-insulin than with a simple clinical guideline or a paper-based protocol.
ISSN:0090-3493
1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181743a5a