Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate vs. Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Moderate, Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn. A Multicentre, Retrospective Study

We have compared intravenous magnesium sulphate vs. inhaled nitric oxide in the therapy of moderate persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate. A retrospective collection of clinical data from 58 neonates was carried out in six neonatal intensive care units of Southern Italy sharing the same o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tropical pediatrics (1980) 2008-06, Vol.54 (3), p.196-199
Hauptverfasser: Raimondi, Francesco, Migliaro, Fiorella, Capasso, Letizia, Ausanio, Gaetano, Bisceglia, Massimo, Giliberti, Paolo, Messina, Francesco, Salvia, Gennaro, Paludetto, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We have compared intravenous magnesium sulphate vs. inhaled nitric oxide in the therapy of moderate persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate. A retrospective collection of clinical data from 58 neonates was carried out in six neonatal intensive care units of Southern Italy sharing the same operational protocols. In our setting, both drugs were effective in treating moderate persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate but nitric oxide (NO) treatment resulted in much faster amelioration of oxygenation index, taken as a marker of the underlying condition. No significant difference was recorded in immediate or long-term complications. We conclude that, wherever NO facilities are not readily available, magnesium sulphate is a safe and cheaper alternative for first-line treatment of moderate persistent pulmonary hypertension of the neonate.
ISSN:0142-6338
1465-3664
DOI:10.1093/tropej/fmm101