Prognostic significance of Ep‐CAM AND Her‐2/neu overexpression in invasive breast cancer
To assess the frequency and prognostic impact of Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu overexpression in patients with breast cancer and to determine its relationship with other prognostic markers, 205 breast cancer patients with a median follow‐up of 10.8 years were enrolled in this retrospective study. Overexpress...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2002-04, Vol.98 (6), p.883-888 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To assess the frequency and prognostic impact of Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu overexpression in patients with breast cancer and to determine its relationship with other prognostic markers, 205 breast cancer patients with a median follow‐up of 10.8 years were enrolled in this retrospective study. Overexpression of Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu in tumor tissue samples was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tumors presenting a Her‐2/neu 2+ staining were additionally analyzed by FISH to exclude false positive results. Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu overexpression was found in 35.6% and 19.5% of the tumor samples, respectively. Both Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu overexpression were predictive for poor disease‐free (DFS) and disease‐related overall survival (DROS). Concurrent Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu overexpression was present in 13.2% of tumor specimens and had an additive negative impact on DFS and DROS. This minority of patients had a median time to relapse of only 34 months, whereas the median time to relapse was not reached in the patient population without Her‐2/neu and Ep‐CAM overexpression. By multivariate analysis Ep‐CAM overexpression proved to be an indicator of poor prognosis, independent of tumor size, histologic grade, hormone receptor expression and Her‐2/neu overexpression. In conclusion, overexpression of Ep‐CAM and Her‐2/neu complement each other as predictors for poor prognosis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Determination of these tumor markers should help in assigning breast cancer patients to 1 of 3 distinct risk categories. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijc.10270 |