How should we grade CIN?

How should we grade CIN? The grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is problematic. CIN represents a morphological continuum, but biopsies displaying this lesion are classified into two (e.g. Bethesda) or three grade categories, sometimes with poor reproducibility. There are also diffic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Histopathology 2002-04, Vol.40 (4), p.377-380
1. Verfasser: Heatley, M K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:How should we grade CIN? The grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is problematic. CIN represents a morphological continuum, but biopsies displaying this lesion are classified into two (e.g. Bethesda) or three grade categories, sometimes with poor reproducibility. There are also difficulties in reliably distinguishing low‐grade CIN from its reactive simulants. Because of problems with inter‐ and intra‐observer disagreement in the grading of CIN and the diagnosis of low‐grade lesions, three expert contributions were commissioned to address the question `how should we grade CIN?'.
ISSN:0309-0167
1365-2559
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01365.x