High throughput screening technologies for direct cyclic AMP measurement

A study comparing five different cAMP detection technologies in terms of sensitivity, robustness, and feasibility for HTS is presented. In this report, the following methods are described: a nonhomogeneous DELFIA, and the homogeneous methods based on time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF), luminescent si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assay and drug development technologies 2003-04, Vol.1 (2), p.291-303
Hauptverfasser: Gabriel, Daniela, Vernier, Magali, Pfeifer, Martin J, Dasen, Boris, Tenaillon, Laurent, Bouhelal, Rochdi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A study comparing five different cAMP detection technologies in terms of sensitivity, robustness, and feasibility for HTS is presented. In this report, the following methods are described: a nonhomogeneous DELFIA, and the homogeneous methods based on time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF), luminescent singlet oxygen channeling or ALPHAScreen, FP, and high-affinity enzyme complementation. DELFIA had the highest sensitivity, whereas ALPHAScreen and HTRF shared several advantages, including high sensitivity, broad dynamic range, and minimal reagent addition steps. For G(s)-coupled antagonist screens, we found HTRF and ALPHAScreen the more sensitive and HTS-compatible techniques.
ISSN:1540-658X
1557-8127
DOI:10.1089/15406580360545107