Clinical evaluation of Functional Electrical Therapy in acute hemiplegic subjects

This paper describes a clinical randomized single-blinded study of the effects of Functional Electrical Therapy (FET) on the paretic arms of subjects with acute hemiplegia caused by strokes. FET is an exercise program that comprises voluntary arm movements and opening, closing, holding, and releasin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2003-09, Vol.40 (5), p.443-453
Hauptverfasser: POPOVIC, Mirjana B, POPOVIC, Dejan B, SINKJAER, Thomas, STEFANOVIC, Aleksandra, SCHWIRTLICH, Laszlo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This paper describes a clinical randomized single-blinded study of the effects of Functional Electrical Therapy (FET) on the paretic arms of subjects with acute hemiplegia caused by strokes. FET is an exercise program that comprises voluntary arm movements and opening, closing, holding, and releasing of objects that are assisted by a neural prosthesis (electrical stimulation). FET consisted of a 30 min everyday exercise for 3 consecutive weeks in addition to conventional therapy. Twenty-eight acute hemiplegic subjects participated in a 6 mo study. The subjects were divided into lower functioning groups (LFGs) and higher functioning groups (HFGs) based on their capacity to voluntarily extend the wrist and fingers against the gravity, and were randomly assigned to controls or FET groups. The outcomes included the Upper Extremity Function Test, the coordination of elbow and shoulder movements, spasticity of key muscles of the paretic arm, and Reduced Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log. FET and control groups showed a recovery trend in all outcome measures. The gains in FET groups were much larger compared with the gains in control groups. The speed of recovery in FET groups was substantially faster compared with the recovery rate in control groups during the first 3 weeks (treatment). The LFG subjects showed less improvement than the HFG in both the FET and control groups.
ISSN:0748-7711
1938-1352
DOI:10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0443