Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy

Objectives. To assess the effect of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, tumor size, and Fuhrman grade on clinical outcome in patients with pathologic T1 (pT1) RCC treated with radical nephrectomy. Methods. Between 1970 and 1998, 840 patients underwent radical nephrectomy for pT1 RCC. Tumors were sub...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2002-04, Vol.59 (4), p.532-537
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Weber K, Cheville, John C, Blute, Michael L, Weaver, Amy L, Zincke, Horst
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives. To assess the effect of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtype, tumor size, and Fuhrman grade on clinical outcome in patients with pathologic T1 (pT1) RCC treated with radical nephrectomy. Methods. Between 1970 and 1998, 840 patients underwent radical nephrectomy for pT1 RCC. Tumors were subtyped and graded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the features associated with metastasis-free survival (MFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We identified a range of tumor sizes of clear cell RCC in which a transition occurred from low to high risk. Cox proportional hazards models were then fitted by using size cutoffs. Results. The mean follow-up (± SD) was 9.4 ± 6.6 years among the patients alive at latest follow-up. At 10 years, the CSS and MFS for clear cell RCC (n = 682) were 89.1% and 88.6%, respectively; for papillary RCC (n = 122), they were 95.5% and 93.8%; and for chromophobe RCC (n = 33), they were both 100%. The differences in CSS ( P = 0.013) and MFS ( P = 0.023) between clear cell RCC and the other subtypes were statistically significant. For clear cell RCC, tumor size and Fuhrman grade were independently associated with CSS and MFS ( P
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01589-8