Bioavailability of β-aescin from horse chestnut seed extract: Comparative clinical studies of two galenic formulations

The bioavailability of beta-aescin--the main active constituent of horse chestnut seed extract--in a nonretarded test medication in comparison with that in a retarded reference formulation was evaluated in 2 randomized crossover clinical trials involving 18 healthy volunteers each. Serum concentrati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2003-09, Vol.20 (5), p.295-304
Hauptverfasser: BÄSSLER, Dagmar, OKPANYI, Samuel, SCHRÖDTER, Andreas, LOEW, Dieter, SCHÜRER, Michael, SCHULZ, Hans-Ulrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The bioavailability of beta-aescin--the main active constituent of horse chestnut seed extract--in a nonretarded test medication in comparison with that in a retarded reference formulation was evaluated in 2 randomized crossover clinical trials involving 18 healthy volunteers each. Serum concentration/time curves derived under steady-state conditions and pharmacokinetic parameters measured during both studies showed no significant difference between absorption rates for the retarded versus nonretarded preparation. In the first study, investigators found a test-to-reference ratio of 1.06 (90% confidence interval [CI] range: 99-113) for the area under the curve (AUC; the primary outcome measure). Absorption rates were diminished during the night compared with daytime rates for both study preparations. In the second study, using AUC and maximum concentration (Cmax) as the primary characteristics, investigators analyzed bioavailability based on the mean of 2 consecutive daytime periods and obtained estimates of 1.07 for AUC (90% CI range: 0.96-1.19) and 1.05 for Cmax (90% CI range: 0.90-1.21). Bioequivalence of the test and reference drug preparations was thus established according to the Note for Guidance on the Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. Both treatments were equally well tolerated.
ISSN:0741-238X
1865-8652
DOI:10.1007/BF02849858