MRI volume measurements of hypointense objects: A phantom study using stereological methods

Volume estimates made from thick slabs overestimate the volume of a positive contrast particle in a translucent matrix and underestimate its volume if the particle has negative contrast and the matrix is opaque. For T2-weighted MRI high signal objects the bias can be corrected according to simple ge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroscience methods 2002-03, Vol.114 (2), p.149-157
Hauptverfasser: Gadeberg, Paula, Gundersen, Hans J.G, Taagehøj, Finn, Jakobsen, Johannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Volume estimates made from thick slabs overestimate the volume of a positive contrast particle in a translucent matrix and underestimate its volume if the particle has negative contrast and the matrix is opaque. For T2-weighted MRI high signal objects the bias can be corrected according to simple geometric models. For negative contrast or hypointense objects the magnitude of the bias is unknown and no corrections have yet been put forward. We wanted to determine the bias of MRI measurements of hypointense objects of known diameter surrounded by a positive contrast solution. One, 3 and 5 mm slices with three different contrast concentrations were obtained according to a stereological MRI protocol. Results were compared with the true object size to estimate the bias. A simple correction for the bias could not be developed due to interslice cross-talk. Cross-talk makes an object appear in more MRI slices than corresponding to its physical size and larger than the true diameter. For phantom measurements an empirical correction could be developed, but for measurements of non-ideal objects such as brain structures the validity of the correction would be unpredictable. Besides avoiding or reducing cross-talk, the best way to deal with this bias is to measure the object's maximal contrast from edge to edge, a solution which is not perfect.
ISSN:0165-0270
1872-678X
DOI:10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00513-1