French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain

Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti J-F, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scale for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:376-82. Objective: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002-03, Vol.83 (3), p.376-382
Hauptverfasser: Wlodyka-Demaille, Samantha, Poiraudeau, Serge, Catanzariti, Jean-François, Rannou, François, Fermanian, Jacques, Revel, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti J-F, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scale for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:376-82. Objective: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Design: Reliability and validity study. Setting: Tertiary care teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. Participants: One hundred one patients (mean age, 49y). Intervention: French translations were obtained by using the “translation-backward translation” method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. Main Outcome Measures: Impairment outcome measures (visual analog scale [VAS] pain, neck range of motion, morning stiffness, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Three functional disability scales (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPDS], Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPQ]) were recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. Results: Test-retest was excellent for the NPDS and NDI (ICC =.91,.93, respectively) and good for the NPQ (ICC =.84). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Expected convergent and divergent validity were observed only for the NPDS; 3 main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. Conclusion: The 3 translated scales are valid, but the NPDS seems to have the best construct validity. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1053/apmr.2002.30623