Why Does TNA Cross-Pair More Strongly with RNA Than with DNA? An Answer From X-ray Analysis
The TNA twist: L‐α‐threofuranosyl (3′→2′) nucleic acid (TNA) residues adopt a C4′‐exo pucker when incorporated into an A‐ (left) or a B‐form DNA duplex (right). The resulting intranucleotide P⋅⋅⋅P distance in TNA is very similar to that in RNA (represented by a C3′‐endo puckered adenosine residue; g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2003-12, Vol.42 (47), p.5893-5895 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The TNA twist: L‐α‐threofuranosyl (3′→2′) nucleic acid (TNA) residues adopt a C4′‐exo pucker when incorporated into an A‐ (left) or a B‐form DNA duplex (right). The resulting intranucleotide P⋅⋅⋅P distance in TNA is very similar to that in RNA (represented by a C3′‐endo puckered adenosine residue; green). The structural data explain earlier observations that TNA hydridizes more stably with RNA than with DNA and that RNA constitutes the better template for ligating TNA fragments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1433-7851 1521-3773 |
DOI: | 10.1002/anie.200352553 |