Voriconazole versus Liposomal Amphotericin B in Patients with Neutropenia and Persistent Fever
To the Editor: On October 4, 2001, the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discussed 1 the results of the clinical trial reported by Walsh and colleagues in this issue of the Journal . 2 The authors present the unstratified analysis in their report. The plan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2002-01, Vol.346 (4), p.289-290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
On October 4, 2001, the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discussed
1
the results of the clinical trial reported by Walsh and colleagues in this issue of the
Journal
.
2
The authors present the unstratified analysis in their report. The plan for the primary analysis of this trial was defined prospectively as the evaluation of the overall stratified rate of response in terms of a five-part composite end point. The stratified analysis is the appropriate primary analysis, since patients were stratified at randomization according to their degree of risk of fungal infection . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM200201243460414 |