Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring

Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. Kt/V can be calculated continuously during dialysis without blood samples using the ionic dialysance method. Unlike the usual method using blood samples, a precise value for the patients' urea distribution v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 2003-12, Vol.64 (6), p.2262-2271
Hauptverfasser: Wuepper, Andreas, Tattersall, James, Kraemer, Matthias, Wilkie, Martin, Edwards, Lorraine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. Kt/V can be calculated continuously during dialysis without blood samples using the ionic dialysance method. Unlike the usual method using blood samples, a precise value for the patients' urea distribution volume is required. This study compared different methods for the determination of urea distribution volume (V) to evaluate their use in Kt/V measurement, based on conductivity monitoring. Ten patients were studied during 40 dialysis sessions. Total body water and V were determined using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), anthropometric data, and blood-based kinetic data. Ionic dialysance was measured by conductivity monitoring. Total body water measured by bioimpedance was determined as VBIS= 37.0 ± 7.1L or 49.6 ± 4.4% of body weight. V determined using ionic dialysance as input to urea kinetic modeling (UKM) was found to correlate well with total body water (VKecn= 36.4 ± 5.2 L). All anthropometric equations overestimated measured V: VWatson= 40.7 ± 3.9L, VHume= 41.8 ± 2.5L, VChertow= 44.6 ± 3.3L, and VChumlea= 43.1 ± 2.9L. Single-pool Kt/V obtained by kinetic modeling was used as reference (Kt/V)SPVV= 1.49 ± 0.15. Using different Vs as the V component in the ionic dialysance Kt/V, we obtained: Kecn*t/VWatson= 1.34 ± 0.12, Kecn*t/VBIS= 1.51 ± 0.21 and Kecn*t/VKecn= 1.52 ± 0.18. The single-pool Kt/V calculated using the ionic dialysance method agreed with the conventional blood sample method provided that V was calculated using BIS or urea kinetics. V by either method was reproducible and varied little in an individual patient. Monthly determination of V allows determination of Kt/V for each dialysis session by ionic dialysance.
ISSN:0085-2538
1523-1755
DOI:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00327.x