Ketamine in Chronic Pain Management: An Evidence-Based Review

Ketamine has diverse effects that may be of relevance to chronic pain including:N-methyl-d-aspartic acid, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, kainate, γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors; inhibition of voltage gated Na+ and K+ channels and serotonin, dopamine re-uptake. Ketamine has bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2003-12, Vol.97 (6), p.1730-1739
Hauptverfasser: Hocking, Graham, Cousins, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ketamine has diverse effects that may be of relevance to chronic pain including:N-methyl-d-aspartic acid, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, kainate, γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors; inhibition of voltage gated Na+ and K+ channels and serotonin, dopamine re-uptake. Ketamine has been in clinical practice for over 30 yr; however, there has been little formal research on the effectiveness of ketamine for chronic pain management. In this review we evaluate the available clinical data as a basis for defining the potential use of ketamine for chronic pain. Literature referenced in this review was obtained from a computer search of EMBASE and MEDLINE from 1966 through August, 2002. Search terms included ketamine, ketalar, pain, painful, analgesic, and analgesia. Abstracts were screened for relevance and publications relating to chronic pain use were obtained. Levels of evidence were stratified according to accepted guidelines (level I-IV). For central pain, there is level II and level IV evidence of efficacy for parenteral and oral ketamine. For complex regional pain syndromes, there is only level IV evidence of efficacy of epidural ketamine. For fibromyalgia, there is level II evidence of pain relief, reduced tenderness at trigger points, and increased endurance. For ischemic pain, a level II study reported a potent dose-dependent analgesic effect, but with a narrow therapeutic window. For nonspecific neuropathic pain, level II and level IV studies reported divergent results with questionable long-term effects on pain. For phantom limb pain and postherpetic neuralgia, level II and level II studies provided objective evidence of reduced hyperpathia and pain relief was usually substantial either after parenteral or oral ketamine. Acute on chronic episodes of severe neuropathic pain represented the most frequent use of ketamine as a “third line analgesic,” often by IV or subcutaneous infusion (level IV). In conclusion, the evidence for efficacy of ketamine for treatment of chronic pain is moderate to weak. However, in situations where standard analgesic options have failed ketamine is a reasonable “third line” option. Further controlled studies are needed.
ISSN:0003-2999
1526-7598
DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000086618.28845.9B