Therapy after single oral agent failure: adding a second oral agent or an insulin mixture?
Aim: to compare the glycemic response to an insulin lispro mixture (25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL) twice daily plus metformin (Mix25+M) with glibenclamide plus metformin (G+M), in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a single oral agent. Methods: 597 patients treated in a rand...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes research and clinical practice 2003-12, Vol.62 (3), p.187-195 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim: to compare the glycemic response to an insulin lispro mixture (25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL) twice daily plus metformin (Mix25+M) with glibenclamide plus metformin (G+M), in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a single oral agent.
Methods: 597 patients treated in a randomized, open-label, 16-week parallel study. Variables evaluated: hemoglobin A1C (A1C)
, patient symptoms, hypoglycemia rate (episodes/patient/30 days), and incidence (% patients experiencing ≥1 episode). For a subset of patients (
N=120), fasting, 1-h, and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (FPG, 1-h ppPG, 2-h ppPG) in response to a standardized test meal (STM) and self-monitored blood glucose (BG) profiles were measured.
Results: improved A1C at endpoint for both groups, and A1C changes from baseline to endpoint were not significantly different between treatments (Mix25+M, −1.87±1.35% vs. G+M, −1.98±1.28%;
p=0.288). Among patients completing STM; endpoint 2-h ppPG was significantly lower with Mix25+M (9.05±3.32 mmol/l vs. 12.31±3.65 mmol/l;
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-8227 1872-8227 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.08.003 |