Collagen and bone viscoelasticity: A dynamic mechanical analysis
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of changes in Type I collagen on the viscoelasticity of bone. Bone coupons were heated at either 100 or 200 °C to induce the thermal denaturation of Type I collagen. Half of these specimens were rehydrated after heat treatment; the other half were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research 2002, Vol.63 (1), p.31-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of changes in Type I collagen on the viscoelasticity of bone. Bone coupons were heated at either 100 or 200 °C to induce the thermal denaturation of Type I collagen. Half of these specimens were rehydrated after heat treatment; the other half were tested in a dry condition. The degree of denatured collagen (DC%) was analyzed by a selective digestion technique with the use of α‐chymotrypsin. Isothermal (37 °C) and variable temperature tests (scans from 35 to 200 °C) were performed with the use of a dynamic mechanical analyzer to evaluate changes in bone viscoelastic properties as a function of collagen damage, specifically, changes in the loss factor (tan δ) and storage modulus (E′) were assessed. Significant collagen denaturation occurred only when bone was heated at 200 °C irrespective of the hydration condition. Also, DC% did not show a significant effect on tan δ. However, higher values of tan δ were observed in wet samples compared to dry specimens. The temperature‐scan tests revealed that the hydration condition, but not DC%, significantly affected the behavior of tan δ. However, E′ was not strongly influenced either by DC% or by water content. These results suggest that at a constant frequency the denaturation of collagen triple‐helical molecules may have few effects on the viscoelasticity of bone, but moisture may play a prominent role in determining this property. © 2001 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 63: 31–36, 2002 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9304 1097-4636 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jbm.10086 |