Is the risk of hypertension an indication for prophylactic nephrectomy in patients with unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney?

Objective: Surgery is still proposed by some as the treatment of choice for unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney (UMCDK) because of the potential complications of hypertension, infection and malignant change. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the risk of hypertension does not just...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology 2003, Vol.37 (5), p.429-432
Hauptverfasser: Tilemis, S., Savanelli, A., Baltogiannis, D., Cigliano, B., Settimi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Surgery is still proposed by some as the treatment of choice for unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney (UMCDK) because of the potential complications of hypertension, infection and malignant change. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the risk of hypertension does not justify routine nephrectomy. Material and Methods: We report 41 cases of UMCDK, treated between 1980 and 2001, 28 of whom were male (68%). Twenty-one patients were nephrectomized (51%). Twenty patients (49%) underwent clinical and ultrasound follow-up. Blood pressure was controlled every 3-4 months (over a period ranging from 9 months to 6 years) and an ultrasound scan was performed every 6 months during the first 2 years, and annually thereafter. Results: In the patients treated non-operatively we observed a progressive spontaneous involution of their multicystic dysplastic kidneys and the total absence of complications such as hypertension or malignancy. Conclusion: It is reasonable to conservatively manage patients with UMCDK by means of repeated ultrasound examinations and blood pressure control.
ISSN:0036-5599
1651-2065
DOI:10.1080/00365590310006282