Comparison of on-line flow-cell and off-line solvent-elimination interfaces for size-exclusion chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in polymer analysis
Two commercial liquid chromatography–Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy interfaces (LC–FTIR), viz. a flow cell and a solvent-elimination interface have been assessed for use in size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) with respect to their chromatographic integrity (i.e. peak asymmetry, chromatograp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Chromatography A 2003-10, Vol.1017 (1), p.83-96 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two commercial liquid chromatography–Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy interfaces (LC–FTIR), viz. a flow cell and a solvent-elimination interface have been assessed for use in size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) with respect to their chromatographic integrity (i.e. peak asymmetry, chromatographic resolution), quantitative and qualitative aspects. A polycarbonate/aliphatic polyester (PC/APE) blend and a polycarbonate-
co-polydimethylsiloxane (PC-
co-PDMS) copolymer were selected for the assessment. Both samples were successfully and selectively analyzed. The relatively large volume of the flow cell and the inherent deposition characteristics of the solvent-elimination interface led to a comparable decrease in the chromatographic resolution. The separation of oligomers was diminished in comparison with SEC-ultra-violet (UV). However, the peak asymmetry was not significantly affected by either interface. For both interfaces, a linear relationship was obtained for the FTIR response versus the injected concentration. The sensitivity was found to be higher for the solvent-elimination interface. For the current model compounds, the flow-cell interface detection limits are worse. However, the repeatability of flow-cell SEC–FTIR, evaluated by means of four SEC–FTIR analyses of polycarbonate, was considerably better than for solvent-elimination SEC–FTIR. This is probably due to the well-defined optical path length of the sample in the flow cell. By spectral subtraction, it was very well possible to obtain qualitative (functional group) information for compound identification also with flow-cell SEC–FTIR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9673 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.026 |