Screening for hepatitis C in genito-urinary medicine clinics: a cost utility analysis

Background/Aims : To estimate the cost utility (cost per QALY) of screening for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in people attending genito-urinary medicine clinics in England. Methods : An epidemiological model of screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov chain model of treatment with combinati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2003-11, Vol.39 (5), p.814-825
Hauptverfasser: Stein, Ken, Dalziel, Kim, Walker, Andrew, Jenkins, Becky, Round, Alison, Royle, Pam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Aims : To estimate the cost utility (cost per QALY) of screening for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in people attending genito-urinary medicine clinics in England. Methods : An epidemiological model of screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov chain model of treatment with combination therapy to estimate cost utility. Parameters for the model were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice. Results : The base case estimate was about £85,000 per QALY. Selective screening is more cost effective. If screening is restricted to only 20% or 10% of attenders, cost utility is estimated as £39,647 and £34,288 per QALY. If screening is restricted only to those with a history of injecting drug use, cost utility would be £27,138 per QALY. Estimates are particularly sensitive to acceptance rates for screening and treatment. Conclusions : Universal screening for HCV in GUM clinics is unlikely to be cost effective. There is limited evidence to support screening of people other than those with a history of injecting drug use and even this policy should be considered with some care and in the context of further research.
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00392-1