Screening for hepatitis C in genito-urinary medicine clinics: a cost utility analysis
Background/Aims : To estimate the cost utility (cost per QALY) of screening for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in people attending genito-urinary medicine clinics in England. Methods : An epidemiological model of screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov chain model of treatment with combinati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hepatology 2003-11, Vol.39 (5), p.814-825 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background/Aims
: To estimate the cost utility (cost per QALY) of screening for hepatitis C (HCV) infection in people attending genito-urinary medicine clinics in England.
Methods
: An epidemiological model of screening and diagnosis was combined with a Markov chain model of treatment with combination therapy to estimate cost utility. Parameters for the model were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice.
Results
: The base case estimate was about £85,000 per QALY. Selective screening is more cost effective. If screening is restricted to only 20% or 10% of attenders, cost utility is estimated as £39,647 and £34,288 per QALY. If screening is restricted only to those with a history of injecting drug use, cost utility would be £27,138 per QALY. Estimates are particularly sensitive to acceptance rates for screening and treatment.
Conclusions
: Universal screening for HCV in GUM clinics is unlikely to be cost effective. There is limited evidence to support screening of people other than those with a history of injecting drug use and even this policy should be considered with some care and in the context of further research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0168-8278 1600-0641 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00392-1 |