Ondansetron versus diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute ureteral colic: a double blind controlled trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansetron and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, diclofenac sodium, as a pain reliever in the treatment of acute ureteral colic. Sixty four patients with severe or moderate pain who were clinically diagnosed as having ureteral colic associated with microscopic or gross hematuria were included in the study. Thirty three patients were administered ondansetron and 31 patients were administered diclofenac sodium. Exclusion critera were known kidney or liver disease causing dysfunction, known hypersensitivity to ondansetron or diclofenac sodium, pregnancy, lactation, duodenal ulcer or bleeding. After pain assessment with a verbal scale and a visual analog scale (VAS), we randomized patients and administered 8 mg ondansetron intravenously to 33 patients and 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscularly to 31 patients and pain scores were recorded every 15 minutes. If significant pain relief was not achieved within 60 minutes, i.v. meperidine was given as rescue pain medication. Ondansetron was effective as a primary pain reliever in 14 (42.4%) patients, whereas 19 patients required additional medication. Diclofenac sodium was effective as a primary pain reliever in 24 (77.4%) patients, whereas 7 patients required additional medication. Ondansetron was not superior to diclofenac sodium in relieving pain in patients with acute ureteral colic.