Precision of the doubly labeled water method in a large-scale application: evaluation of a streamlined-dosing protocol in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study

Objective : To evaluate whether the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is precise under conditions required for a large-scale evaluation of dietary intake instruments. Design : Energy expenditure was measured in 484 subjects (main study). Subjects received one of five different weight DLW dose bottle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical nutrition 2003-11, Vol.57 (11), p.1370-1377
Hauptverfasser: Trabulsi, J, Troiano, R P, Subar, A F, Sharbaugh, C, Kipnis, V, Schatzkin, A, Schoeller, D A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective : To evaluate whether the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is precise under conditions required for a large-scale evaluation of dietary intake instruments. Design : Energy expenditure was measured in 484 subjects (main study). Subjects received one of five different weight DLW dose bottles prepared in advance of the study. A repeat energy expenditure measure was obtained in a subset of 24 subjects (substudy). DLW measures of energy expenditure were performed over a 2-week interval with urine collection at the beginning and end. Setting : Free-living environment with three clinic visits in the Maryland suburban area of Washington, DC. Subjects : A total of 484 subjects (261 men and 223 women) aged 40–69 y, 24 of whom (13 men and 11 women) participated in a substudy in which DLW was administered a second time. Results : The coefficient of variation of the DLW energy expenditure measurement was 5.1%. This included a 2.9% analytical and a 4.2% physiologic variation. Based on observed initial isotopic enrichment, the preweighed dosages were optimal in 70% of the main study subjects, and 9% received a dose that was less than optimal. Only six subjects (1%) were excluded because the final isotopic enrichment was too low to conduct precise measurement. Conclusions : Use of preweighed DLW dosages did not compromise the precision of the DLW method. The DLW method is a reliable measure of energy expenditure for large-scale evaluations of dietary intake instruments. Sponsorship : The National Cancer Institute.
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601698