Response Latency in Canis familiaris: Mental Ability or Mental Strategy?

Animal studies of cognitive aging typically use measures of response accuracy (RA) to evaluate cognitive function, which declines with age. Human aging studies, by contrast, frequently measure response latency (RL), with faster responses being indicative of superior performance. To examine the influ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral neuroscience 2003-10, Vol.117 (5), p.1066-1075
Hauptverfasser: Nippak, Pria M. D, Chan, Alan D. F, Campbell, Zachariah, Muggenburg, Bruce, Head, Elizabeth, Ikeda-Douglas, Candace J, Murphey, Heather, Cotman, Carl W, Milgram, Norton W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Animal studies of cognitive aging typically use measures of response accuracy (RA) to evaluate cognitive function, which declines with age. Human aging studies, by contrast, frequently measure response latency (RL), with faster responses being indicative of superior performance. To examine the influence of age on RL in an animal model, the authors assessed RA with RL in young and aged beagle dogs ( Canis familiaris ) tested on a 3-component delayed nonmatching-to-position task, which comprised 3 subtests. Young dogs displayed significantly slower RLs and higher RAs and showed RL slowing with greater complexity, compared with aged dogs. In addition, the slower responding young dogs made fewer errors. Thus, RL appears to reflect the learning strategy applied, rather than the level of mental ability.
ISSN:0735-7044
1939-0084
DOI:10.1037/0735-7044.117.5.1066