Reducing Trauma Payment Denials with Computerized Collaborative Billing
BACKGROUND Trauma care demands constant physician availability, resulting in rotational coverage systems. Third-party payors consider separate trauma surgeon bills as originating from the same individual. Trauma surgeons may be unaware of their colleagues’ billing history on jointly managed patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care injury, infection, and critical care, 2003-10, Vol.55 (4), p.762-770 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND Trauma care demands constant physician availability, resulting in rotational coverage systems. Third-party payors consider separate trauma surgeon bills as originating from the same individual. Trauma surgeons may be unaware of their colleagues’ billing history on jointly managed patients. Not all postoperative procedures and evaluation and management services are denied by global surgical package rules. We investigated whether a networked billing program designed to crosscheck for global package coding concerns would reduce payment denials.
METHODS A networked relational database was created for trauma surgeons to enter billable encounters, displaying global periods and operative diagnoses while prompting for postoperative modifiers. Denials were compared for equivalent time periods before and after program initiation.
RESULTS Payment denials fell from 361 to 16 for “bundled” evaluation and management services and from 55 to 13 for bundled postoperative procedures. Time spent on billing decreased and legibility improved. Overall savings totaled $183,404.
CONCLUSION Collaborative billing can improve payments for professional trauma care. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5282 1529-8809 |
DOI: | 10.1097/01.TA.0000085861.89277.DA |