Choice of treatment: outcomes and treatment goals
Rather, physicians were limited to ?-blockers, reserpine, and clonidine; imperfect add-on choices for at least some of the treatments, where a diuretic would be far more usual and probably preferable. [...]although there is a well-established, essentially additive effect on blood pressure produced b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American heart journal 2003-10, Vol.146 (4), p.565-567 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rather, physicians were limited to ?-blockers, reserpine, and clonidine; imperfect add-on choices for at least some of the treatments, where a diuretic would be far more usual and probably preferable. [...]although there is a well-established, essentially additive effect on blood pressure produced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and diuretics, although all outcome studies of ACEIs in heart failure used those drugs in addition to diuretics, and although that combination (unlike ACEIs alone) has a similar effect on blood pressure in both black and nonblack patients, such a combination could not, for the most part, be used in ALLHAT. [...]despite the constrained follow-on therapy, there was no difference between chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril for the primary study outcome (total coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction), all-cause mortality, or combined coronary heart disease. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00362-4 |