Choice of treatment: outcomes and treatment goals

Rather, physicians were limited to ?-blockers, reserpine, and clonidine; imperfect add-on choices for at least some of the treatments, where a diuretic would be far more usual and probably preferable. [...]although there is a well-established, essentially additive effect on blood pressure produced b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American heart journal 2003-10, Vol.146 (4), p.565-567
1. Verfasser: Temple, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rather, physicians were limited to ?-blockers, reserpine, and clonidine; imperfect add-on choices for at least some of the treatments, where a diuretic would be far more usual and probably preferable. [...]although there is a well-established, essentially additive effect on blood pressure produced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and diuretics, although all outcome studies of ACEIs in heart failure used those drugs in addition to diuretics, and although that combination (unlike ACEIs alone) has a similar effect on blood pressure in both black and nonblack patients, such a combination could not, for the most part, be used in ALLHAT. [...]despite the constrained follow-on therapy, there was no difference between chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril for the primary study outcome (total coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction), all-cause mortality, or combined coronary heart disease.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00362-4