Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons

(+)Amphetamine was added as a training stimulus for pigeons previously trained to discriminate among pentobarbital, morphine and saline using a three-choice procedure. Pigeons quickly learned the four-choice drug discrimination. Generalization from the training drugs was similar to that established...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural pharmacology 2001-12, Vol.12 (8), p.621-628
Hauptverfasser: Li, Mi, McMillan, D.E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:(+)Amphetamine was added as a training stimulus for pigeons previously trained to discriminate among pentobarbital, morphine and saline using a three-choice procedure. Pigeons quickly learned the four-choice drug discrimination. Generalization from the training drugs was similar to that established with simpler drug discriminations; pentobarbital generalized to chlordiazepoxide, morphine generalized to methadone, and (+)amphetamine generalized to cocaine and methamphetamine. Low doses of phencyclidine generalized to saline, while higher doses partially generalized to pentobarbital and (+)amphetamine. When dose–response curves were redetermined with a cumulative-dosing procedure, the same pattern of generalization occurred as under single-dose procedures. Dose–response curves were quantal under both the single-dose and the cumulative-dosing procedures. The four-choice procedure offers some important advantages for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs that interact with multiple receptor subtypes and for studying drug mixtures.
ISSN:0955-8810
1473-5849
DOI:10.1097/00008877-200112000-00006