Statutory and Regulatory Issues for Clinical Nurse Specialist (CNS) Practice: Ensuring the Public’s Access to CNS Services

The practice environment of healthcare in the United States is fluid, dynamic, and sometimes chaotic. Statutory, regulatory, and credentialing requirements are critical elements of this changeable environment affecting clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) and other advanced practice nurses (APNs). CNSs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nurse specialist 2001-05, Vol.15 (3), p.108-114
Hauptverfasser: LYON, BRENDA L, MINARIK, PAMELA A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The practice environment of healthcare in the United States is fluid, dynamic, and sometimes chaotic. Statutory, regulatory, and credentialing requirements are critical elements of this changeable environment affecting clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) and other advanced practice nurses (APNs). CNSs are estimated to comprise approximately 54,000 APNs, based on the 2000 National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses. Although statutes and regulations related to APNs are reviewed regularly, there has not been a critical analysis of statutes and regulations specifically governing CNS practice in the United States. This lack is largely due to the absence of a national association devoted to CNSs before 1995. However, recently there has been a resurgence of interest and need for CNS services. Therefore, it is particularly important that any statutory and/or regulatory barriers to CNS practice be removed. In 1998, the National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists Legislative and Regulatory Committee embarked on a critical analysis of state statutes and regulations governing CNS practice. All 50 state boards of nursing and the District of Columbia board of nursing were requested to send copies of their statutes and regulations governing CNS practice. Responses were received from 48 states. This article summarizes the state of regulation of CNS practice and identifies significant barriers to CNS practice that should be systematically addressed. The patchwork quilt of CNS regulation that varies from state to state results in over-restrictive and underinclusive provisions that preclude ease of reciprocity and deprive the public full access to CNS services. Recommendations for addressing the barriers are made.
ISSN:0887-6274
1538-9782
DOI:10.1097/00002800-200105000-00014