Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery

This study sought to determine whether 3-D transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS), compared with the 2-D transvaginal approach (2D-TVS), offers a better identification of some specific features of the uterine cervix that could be useful in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD). A total of 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2003-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1261-1265
Hauptverfasser: Severi, Filiberto Maria, Bocchi, Caterina, Florio, Pasquale, Picciolini, Enrico, D'Aniello, Gemma, Petraglia, Felice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study sought to determine whether 3-D transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS), compared with the 2-D transvaginal approach (2D-TVS), offers a better identification of some specific features of the uterine cervix that could be useful in the prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery (PTD). A total of 103 women with singleton pregnancies were prospectively evaluated with 2D-TVS and 3D-TVS in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, χ 2 and Pearson test (p < 0.05 was considered significant) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Significant differences between these approaches were found for cervical length (p < 0.001). A significant correlation was identified between 3D-TVS cervical length and the interval between ultrasound examination and delivery as well as the gestational age at delivery (both p < 0.001). ROC curve identified a threshold for 3D-TVS cervical length of 35 mm as an optimal predictor of PTD in the second trimester (sensitivity 100%, specificity 88%). 3D-TVS evaluation of the cervix in pregnancy seems to be an effective, noninvasive method for predicting PTD risk. (E-mail: severi@unisi.it)
ISSN:0301-5629
1879-291X
DOI:10.1016/S0301-5629(03)01011-1