Cervical assessment at the routine 23‐weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography

Objectives To compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnancy and examine the factors that may influence these measurements. Methods The study population consisted of 149 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine ultrasound examination at...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2000-04, Vol.15 (4), p.292-296
Hauptverfasser: To, M.S., Skentou, C., Cicero, S., Nicolaides, K.H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnancy and examine the factors that may influence these measurements. Methods The study population consisted of 149 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine ultrasound examination at 23 weeks of gestation. In all women the cervix was successfully visualized by transvaginal sonography and cervical length was measured after emptying of the bladder. This measurement was compared to that obtained by transabdominal sonography. In addition the ability to visualize the cervix transabdominally was examined in relation to body mass index (BMI), bladder volume and cervical length. Results The percentage of cases in which the cervix could be seen transabdominally increased from 42% for bladder volume of < 50 ml to 73% for volumes > 150 ml, and 13% for cervical length < 20 mm to 51% for lengths > 40 mm. The ability to visualize the cervix was unrelated to BMI. Although there was a significant association between measurements taken transabdominally with those made transvaginally, measurements taken with a full bladder were significantly longer than those with an empty bladder. Conclusion The aim of cervical assessment in pregnancy is to identify women with a short cervix because they are at high risk of preterm delivery. This aim can not be fulfilled by transabdominal sonography. Such a scan fails to visualize the cervix in a high proportion of cases and in particular those with a short cervix. Furthermore, successful visualization requires a full bladder which falsely increases cervical length. Copyright © 2000 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN:0960-7692
1469-0705
DOI:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x