Local Versus Systemic Adjunctive Antibiotic Therapy in 28 Patients With Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis
Background: Although the use of systemic antibiotics has been studied in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis (formerly rapidly progressive periodontitis), the use of adjunctive tetracycline fibers in these patients has not been reported. The purpose of the present study was to compare...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of periodontology (1970) 2001-09, Vol.72 (9), p.1241-1245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Although the use of systemic antibiotics has been studied in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis (formerly rapidly progressive periodontitis), the use of adjunctive tetracycline fibers in these patients has not been reported. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical response of local versus systemic antibiotic treatment as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in patients with GAgP.
Methods: After initial therapy and full‐mouth scaling and root planing (SRP), 30 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 antibiotic treatment groups. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded with an automated probe prior to SRP at baseline (BL) and 15, 30, 41, and 54 weeks later. Three months after SRP, the patients were treated with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (500 mg tid; SRP + AUG group) or with local tetracycline fiber in pockets with PD ≥5 mm (SRP + TCF group).
Results: In both treatment groups, PD decreased significantly from BL to week 54 (6.2 ± 1.5 mm to 4.7 ± 1.4 mm for SRP + TCF and 6.5 ± 1.4 mm to 4.2 ± 0.6 mm for SRP + AUG). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in pocket reduction. Similarly, in both treatment groups, there were small but significant gains in CAL from BL to week 54 (12.0 ± 1.8 mm to 11.3 ± 1.8 mm for SRP + TCF and 12.3 ± 1.5 mm to 11.2 ± 1.2 mm for SRP + AUG). The difference in CAL gain between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. At the final examination, both groups showed significant PD reduction and CAL gain (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3492 1943-3670 |
DOI: | 10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1241 |