Experimental evaluation of vessel diameter from 0.3 to 8 mm in CE MR angiography

To evaluate the detection rate of vascular stenosis in contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography using a flow phantom. The examinations were performed on a 1.5 T whole body imaging system (Magnetom Symphony/Quantum) with 30 mT/m gradient field strength using a body-phased-array coil. Different 3D sequence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:RöFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebende Verfahren 2001-09, Vol.173 (9), p.842-847
Hauptverfasser: Vosshenrich, R, Engeroff, B, Müller, C, Fischer, U, Grabbe, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the detection rate of vascular stenosis in contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography using a flow phantom. The examinations were performed on a 1.5 T whole body imaging system (Magnetom Symphony/Quantum) with 30 mT/m gradient field strength using a body-phased-array coil. Different 3D sequences (TR/TE/FA < 5 ms/< 2 ms/25 degrees ) with slice thicknesses ranging from 0.67 to 1.25 mm were applied. A gelantine-filled plastic cylinder with PVC tubes of 8 mm diameter was used as a vascular phantom. The tubes had concentric and excentric stenoses (50 - 90 %) of different lengths. For the detection of different vessel diameters another phantom with 0.3 - 8 mm silicon tubes was used. Both systems were flushed with a solution of Gd-DTPA (0.15 mmol/l) and saline at flow rates from 50 to 200 cm/s. The phantoms were positioned 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees towards the z-axis. The degree of stenosis was under- and overestimated in less than 10 %. The sequence with the highest spatial resolution provided the best results. Detection and evaluation of tubes >/= 2 mm proved to be reliable. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography provides an almost exact evaluation of the degree of stenosis in the phantom study. Evaluation of vessel diameters < 2 mm is not possible.
ISSN:1438-9029
DOI:10.1055/s-2001-16984