A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare anesthetic efficacy and postoperative analgesia of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa (popliteal block). Methods: A prospective, double‐blind study was carried out in 58 adult patients scheduled for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2001-09, Vol.45 (8), p.967-970
Hauptverfasser: Fernández-Guisasola, J., Andueza, A., Burgos, E., Plaza, A., Porras, M. C., Reboto, P., Rivera, J. C., García Del Valle, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The purpose of this study was to compare anesthetic efficacy and postoperative analgesia of 0.5% ropivacaine and 1% mepivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa (popliteal block). Methods: A prospective, double‐blind study was carried out in 58 adult patients scheduled for outpatient foot or ankle surgery. They were randomized to receive popliteal block with 40 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (group R) or 1% mepivacaine (group M). An atraumatic, Teflon‐coated needle connected to a neurostimulator was used to make a single puncture using a posterior approach. The times to onset of sensory and motor block, and the need for intraoperative sedation were recorded. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time to first analgesic use, time to return of full sensation in the foot, and their evaluation of the technique. Results: Onset time (mean±standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) of both sensory block (6.5±5.1 min, 4.47–8.49, in group R and 6.2±3.7 min, 4.83–7.69, in group M) and motor block (6.6±4.4 min, 4.81–8.23, in group R and 7.9±4.1 min, 6.29–9.53, in group M) was similar in both groups. Postoperative analgesia lasted longer in group R (15.2±5.1 h, 13.25–17.21) than in group M (5.7±1.8 h, 5.01–6.41; P
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450808.x