Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli
We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Muscle & nerve 2001-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1332-1338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1332 |
container_title | Muscle & nerve |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Meyers, B.M. Nguyen, J. Cafarelli, E. |
description | We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning at 5 Hz and rising to 100 Hz. We compared the IFT to a standard series of constant‐frequency trains (CFT) under two conditions. Force–frequency curves were examined, first in response to altered muscle length and second, following fatigue. There was no leftward shift in the curve when the knee extensors were shortened, although maximal force increased. In contrast, we observed a rightward shift in the curve after fatigue with both protocols; the frequency required to develop 50% of maximal force increased by 48% (P < .01) with CFT and 58% (P < .001) with an IFT. The CFT produced an irregular pattern of low‐frequency fatigue recovery. In the IFT, low‐frequency fatigue was greatest at the onset of recovery and decreased linearly until 120 s. These experiments show that the IFT protocol reveals alterations in muscle performance similar to the more traditional CFT. However, it requires only 2.8 s to administer and was judged more tolerable by 70% of our subjects. This suggests that the IFT may be an effective alternative for determining the FFR in human muscle for clinical and experimental purposes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1332–1338, 2001 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mus.1152 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71193572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71193572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-44769f301bf2a412a84af58141bbf772d1e599b93f58cd1478e2397cce068b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtO3DAUBmALUZWBVuIJkDdUbDL42E5sL9GIQtWhLKAtO8vx2K0hl8FOgHn7Gk1UVqyOdPSdi36EDoHMgRB62o5pDlDSHTQDokTBSyV30YwAl0XF1N0e2k_pnhACshIf0V62FVXAZujyuh5M6EL3B_s-Wlf46B5H19kNtmN8cgk_h-EvNjhl0jjMiuRs363wEPMY7j1OQ2jHJnxCH7xpkvs81QN0-_X8dnFZLK8vvi3OloVlsqQF56JSnhGoPTUcqJHc-FICh7r2QtAVuFKpWrHctCvgQjrKlLDWkUrm9gH6sl27jn3-Mw26Dcm6pjGd68ekBYBipaAZnmyhjX1K0Xm9jqE1caOB6NfQdA5Nv4aW6dG0c6xbt3qDU0oZHE_AJGsaH01nQ3pznAgpCWRXbN1zaNzm3YP66ufNdHjyIQ3u5b838UFXgolS__5xoclVWS1-fQcN7B8DJpCy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71193572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Meyers, B.M. ; Nguyen, J. ; Cafarelli, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyers, B.M. ; Nguyen, J. ; Cafarelli, E.</creatorcontrib><description>We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning at 5 Hz and rising to 100 Hz. We compared the IFT to a standard series of constant‐frequency trains (CFT) under two conditions. Force–frequency curves were examined, first in response to altered muscle length and second, following fatigue. There was no leftward shift in the curve when the knee extensors were shortened, although maximal force increased. In contrast, we observed a rightward shift in the curve after fatigue with both protocols; the frequency required to develop 50% of maximal force increased by 48% (P < .01) with CFT and 58% (P < .001) with an IFT. The CFT produced an irregular pattern of low‐frequency fatigue recovery. In the IFT, low‐frequency fatigue was greatest at the onset of recovery and decreased linearly until 120 s. These experiments show that the IFT protocol reveals alterations in muscle performance similar to the more traditional CFT. However, it requires only 2.8 s to administer and was judged more tolerable by 70% of our subjects. This suggests that the IFT may be an effective alternative for determining the FFR in human muscle for clinical and experimental purposes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1332–1338, 2001</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-639X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mus.1152</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11562913</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MUNEDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electric Stimulation ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; force-frequency relationship ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; low-frequency fatigue ; Male ; Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle Fatigue - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; skeletal muscle ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Muscle & nerve, 2001-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1332-1338</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-44769f301bf2a412a84af58141bbf772d1e599b93f58cd1478e2397cce068b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-44769f301bf2a412a84af58141bbf772d1e599b93f58cd1478e2397cce068b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmus.1152$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmus.1152$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14078801$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11562913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyers, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafarelli, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli</title><title>Muscle & nerve</title><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><description>We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning at 5 Hz and rising to 100 Hz. We compared the IFT to a standard series of constant‐frequency trains (CFT) under two conditions. Force–frequency curves were examined, first in response to altered muscle length and second, following fatigue. There was no leftward shift in the curve when the knee extensors were shortened, although maximal force increased. In contrast, we observed a rightward shift in the curve after fatigue with both protocols; the frequency required to develop 50% of maximal force increased by 48% (P < .01) with CFT and 58% (P < .001) with an IFT. The CFT produced an irregular pattern of low‐frequency fatigue recovery. In the IFT, low‐frequency fatigue was greatest at the onset of recovery and decreased linearly until 120 s. These experiments show that the IFT protocol reveals alterations in muscle performance similar to the more traditional CFT. However, it requires only 2.8 s to administer and was judged more tolerable by 70% of our subjects. This suggests that the IFT may be an effective alternative for determining the FFR in human muscle for clinical and experimental purposes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1332–1338, 2001</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>force-frequency relationship</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>low-frequency fatigue</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>skeletal muscle</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0148-639X</issn><issn>1097-4598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtO3DAUBmALUZWBVuIJkDdUbDL42E5sL9GIQtWhLKAtO8vx2K0hl8FOgHn7Gk1UVqyOdPSdi36EDoHMgRB62o5pDlDSHTQDokTBSyV30YwAl0XF1N0e2k_pnhACshIf0V62FVXAZujyuh5M6EL3B_s-Wlf46B5H19kNtmN8cgk_h-EvNjhl0jjMiuRs363wEPMY7j1OQ2jHJnxCH7xpkvs81QN0-_X8dnFZLK8vvi3OloVlsqQF56JSnhGoPTUcqJHc-FICh7r2QtAVuFKpWrHctCvgQjrKlLDWkUrm9gH6sl27jn3-Mw26Dcm6pjGd68ekBYBipaAZnmyhjX1K0Xm9jqE1caOB6NfQdA5Nv4aW6dG0c6xbt3qDU0oZHE_AJGsaH01nQ3pznAgpCWRXbN1zaNzm3YP66ufNdHjyIQ3u5b838UFXgolS__5xoclVWS1-fQcN7B8DJpCy</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Meyers, B.M.</creator><creator>Nguyen, J.</creator><creator>Cafarelli, E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli</title><author>Meyers, B.M. ; Nguyen, J. ; Cafarelli, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-44769f301bf2a412a84af58141bbf772d1e599b93f58cd1478e2397cce068b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>force-frequency relationship</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>low-frequency fatigue</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fatigue - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>skeletal muscle</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyers, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafarelli, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Muscle & nerve</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyers, B.M.</au><au>Nguyen, J.</au><au>Cafarelli, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli</atitle><jtitle>Muscle & nerve</jtitle><addtitle>Muscle Nerve</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1332</spage><epage>1338</epage><pages>1332-1338</pages><issn>0148-639X</issn><eissn>1097-4598</eissn><coden>MUNEDE</coden><abstract>We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning at 5 Hz and rising to 100 Hz. We compared the IFT to a standard series of constant‐frequency trains (CFT) under two conditions. Force–frequency curves were examined, first in response to altered muscle length and second, following fatigue. There was no leftward shift in the curve when the knee extensors were shortened, although maximal force increased. In contrast, we observed a rightward shift in the curve after fatigue with both protocols; the frequency required to develop 50% of maximal force increased by 48% (P < .01) with CFT and 58% (P < .001) with an IFT. The CFT produced an irregular pattern of low‐frequency fatigue recovery. In the IFT, low‐frequency fatigue was greatest at the onset of recovery and decreased linearly until 120 s. These experiments show that the IFT protocol reveals alterations in muscle performance similar to the more traditional CFT. However, it requires only 2.8 s to administer and was judged more tolerable by 70% of our subjects. This suggests that the IFT may be an effective alternative for determining the FFR in human muscle for clinical and experimental purposes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1332–1338, 2001</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11562913</pmid><doi>10.1002/mus.1152</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-639X |
ispartof | Muscle & nerve, 2001-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1332-1338 |
issn | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71193572 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Electric Stimulation Electromyography - methods Female force-frequency relationship Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans low-frequency fatigue Male Motor control and motor pathways. Reflexes. Control centers of vegetative functions. Vestibular system and equilibration Muscle Contraction - physiology Muscle Fatigue - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiology skeletal muscle Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obtaining%20force-frequency%20curves%20with%20a%20single%203-second%20train%20of%20stimuli&rft.jtitle=Muscle%20&%20nerve&rft.au=Meyers,%20B.M.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1332&rft.epage=1338&rft.pages=1332-1338&rft.issn=0148-639X&rft.eissn=1097-4598&rft.coden=MUNEDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mus.1152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71193572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71193572&rft_id=info:pmid/11562913&rfr_iscdi=true |