Obtaining force-frequency curves with a single 3-second train of stimuli

We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2001-10, Vol.24 (10), p.1332-1338
Hauptverfasser: Meyers, B.M., Nguyen, J., Cafarelli, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We devised a method to assess the force–frequency relationship (FFR) in human skeletal muscle that involved delivery of a single 2.8‐s train of shocks directly to the femoral nerve. This increasing‐frequency train (IFT) was based on a power function, with a range of stimulation frequencies beginning at 5 Hz and rising to 100 Hz. We compared the IFT to a standard series of constant‐frequency trains (CFT) under two conditions. Force–frequency curves were examined, first in response to altered muscle length and second, following fatigue. There was no leftward shift in the curve when the knee extensors were shortened, although maximal force increased. In contrast, we observed a rightward shift in the curve after fatigue with both protocols; the frequency required to develop 50% of maximal force increased by 48% (P < .01) with CFT and 58% (P < .001) with an IFT. The CFT produced an irregular pattern of low‐frequency fatigue recovery. In the IFT, low‐frequency fatigue was greatest at the onset of recovery and decreased linearly until 120 s. These experiments show that the IFT protocol reveals alterations in muscle performance similar to the more traditional CFT. However, it requires only 2.8 s to administer and was judged more tolerable by 70% of our subjects. This suggests that the IFT may be an effective alternative for determining the FFR in human muscle for clinical and experimental purposes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 24: 1332–1338, 2001
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.1152