The effects of inhaled nitric oxide, gabexate mesilate, and retrograde flush in the lung graft from non-heart beating minipig donors
The use of lung grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) is one way of solving the donor organ shortage problem. In this experiment, we studied the effect of retrograde flush (RF) from the left atrium before harvest, inhaled nitric oxide (NO), and gabexate mesilate (FOY), a protease inhibitor, in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation 2000-05, Vol.69 (10), p.2019-2027 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of lung grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) is one way of solving the donor organ shortage problem. In this experiment, we studied the effect of retrograde flush (RF) from the left atrium before harvest, inhaled nitric oxide (NO), and gabexate mesilate (FOY), a protease inhibitor, in the lung grafts from NHBD.
Forty-eight Lee-Sung, small-ear, miniature pigs (15-20 kg) were divided into 24 pairs (donor and recipient) and four groups. The donor lungs were flushed and harvested 90 min after cardiac arrest. No i.v. heparin was administered until the time before flush and harvest. Left single lung transplantation was undertaken, and the recipients were observed for 18 hr. The grafts warm and cold ischemia times were 90 (controlled) and 183+/-23.4 min. Group 1 (untreated control, UC, n=6) had core perfusion through a Swan-Ganz catheter followed by a single, antegrade flush with modified Euro-Collin's solution containing heparin, urokinase, and PGE1. Group 2 (RF group, n=6) had the same as group 1, except that one additive retrograde flush through the left atrium was administered. Group 3 (NO group, n=6) had the same as group 1, except that 20 parts per million (ppm) inhaled NO was administered for the cadaver donors before the graft harvest, and for the recipients after the grafts reperfusion. Group 4 (FOY group, n=6) had the same as group 1, except that the recipients received FOY i.v. infusion from the beginning of the recipient's operation and continuously throughout the experiments.
Compared with the group 1 (control), group 2 (RF) had significantly (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1337 1534-6080 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00007890-200005270-00008 |