Retention of Native-like Oligomerization States in Transmembrane Segment Peptides: Application to the Escherichia coli Aspartate Receptor
Biophysical study of the transmembrane (TM) domains of integral membrane proteins has traditionally been impeded by their hydrophobic nature. As a result, an understanding of the details of protein−protein interactions within membranes is often lacking. We have demonstrated previously that model TM...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochemistry (Easton) 2001-09, Vol.40 (37), p.11106-11113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Biophysical study of the transmembrane (TM) domains of integral membrane proteins has traditionally been impeded by their hydrophobic nature. As a result, an understanding of the details of protein−protein interactions within membranes is often lacking. We have demonstrated previously that model TM segments with flanking cationic residues spontaneously fold into α-helices upon insertion into membrane-mimetic environments. Here, we extend these studies to investigate whether such constructs consisting of TM helices from biological systems retain their native secondary structures and oligomeric states. Single-spanning TM domains from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), glycophorin A (GPA), and the influenza A virus M2 ion channel (M2) were designed and synthesized with three to four lysine residues at both N- and C-termini. Each construct was shown to adopt an α-helical conformation upon insertion into sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. Furthermore, micelle-inserted TM segments associated on SDS−PAGE gels according to their respective native-like oligomeric states: EGFR was monomeric, GPA was dimeric, and M2 was tetrameric. This approach was then used to investigate whether one or both of the TM segments (Tar-1 and Tar-2) from the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor were responsible for its homodimeric nature. Our results showed that Tar-1 formed SDS-resistant homodimers, while Tar-2 was monomeric. Furthermore, no heterooligomerization between Tar-1 and Tar-2 was detected, implicating the Tar-1 helix as the oligomeric determinant for the Tar protein. The overall results indicate that this approach can be used to elucidate the details of TM domain folding for both single-spanning and multispanning membrane proteins. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-2960 1520-4995 |
DOI: | 10.1021/bi010642e |