Comparison of Automated Short Tandem Repeat and Manual Variable Number of Tandem Repeat Analysis of Chimerism in Bone Marrow Transplant Patients
Hematopoietic chimerism can be monitored in bone marrow transplant patients at DNA polymorphic sites. In this study, allele detection and quantification by ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels were compared with automated fluorescent sizing on an artificially mixed system and on chimeric post-trans...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic molecular pathology 2000-06, Vol.9 (2), p.91-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Hematopoietic chimerism can be monitored in bone marrow transplant patients at DNA polymorphic sites. In this study, allele detection and quantification by ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels were compared with automated fluorescent sizing on an artificially mixed system and on chimeric post-transplant whole blood and sorted cell populations. A panel of five variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) were amplified and quantified visually on an ethidium bromide-stained gel. The ten short tandem repeats (STRs) were amplified as a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescently detected on a DNA sequencer. Fluorescent band intensities were converted to fluorescent peak areas for allele quantification. Using mixed DNA of different proportions, both STRs and VNTRs showed linearity and appeared equally sensitive. However, case studies showed STRs to be more sensitive ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1052-9551 1533-4066 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00019606-200006000-00005 |