Pulsed field gel electrophoresis typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin isolated from an intensive care unit

Increased isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin prompted this epidemiological survey in the authors intensive care unit. Of 224 medical and surgical patients with hepatobiliary disease, in hospital between December 1998 and July 1999, 14 (6...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2001-09, Vol.49 (1), p.62-68
Hauptverfasser: Schlegel, L., Saliba, F., Mangeney, N., Mathieu, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increased isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin prompted this epidemiological survey in the authors intensive care unit. Of 224 medical and surgical patients with hepatobiliary disease, in hospital between December 1998 and July 1999, 14 (6.3%) had at least one isolate of CoNS with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin. A total of 27 isolates with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin were recovered from these 14 patients. Pulsed field electrophoresis (PFGE) with Sma I endonuclease demonstrated that CoNS isolates obtained from different patients were unrelated. In addition, different isolates obtain from the same patient were also unrelated, with the exception of two patients. Eighteen out of 27 isolates (66.7%) with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin were recovered after an earlier treatment with teicoplanin or vancomycin (median 13.1g, range 2.4–32.7g per patient). Only four CoNS strains with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin induced serious infection, all of which responded well to vancomycin therapy. Emergence of CoNS strains with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin remained limited in hospitalized patients, and was not related to a clonal spread of a particular resistant strain.
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
DOI:10.1053/jhin.2001.1046