Antibacterial Activity of Anesthetic Solutions and Preservatives: An In Vitro Comparative Study

PURPOSE.To investigate the antibacterial activity of topical anesthetic solutions and their preservatives individually in vitro, to determine involvement with bacterial growth inhibition. MATERIAL AND METHODS.Proparacaine and tetracaine (in concentrations of 0.125%, 0.25%, and 0.50%), edetate disodi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornea 2000-05, Vol.19 (3), p.353-354
Hauptverfasser: Dantas, Paulo Elias C, Uesugui, Eliane, Nishiwaki–Dantas, M Cristina, Mimica, Lycia J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE.To investigate the antibacterial activity of topical anesthetic solutions and their preservatives individually in vitro, to determine involvement with bacterial growth inhibition. MATERIAL AND METHODS.Proparacaine and tetracaine (in concentrations of 0.125%, 0.25%, and 0.50%), edetate disodium (EDTA), benzalkonium chloride, EDTA + benzalkonium chloride, and sterile saline solution were used. Five microliters of each solution were applied to standard filter paper disks and placed in Mueller–Hinton agar previously inoculated with known strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Zones of growth inhibition were measured 24 hours later and analyzed. RESULTS.There were no zones of inhibition in the agar inoculated with P. aeruginosa to all tested solutions. Benzalkonium chloride alone and associated with EDTA inhibited growth of S. aureus. All other solutions did not inhibit S. aureus. CONCLUSION.Preservative-free anesthetic solutions seemed not to interfere with bacterial development in culture media. Benzalkonium chloride alone and associated with EDTA inhibited development of gram positive bacteria, S. aureus, but did not inhibit P. aeruginosa.
ISSN:0277-3740
1536-4798
DOI:10.1097/00003226-200005000-00019