Postoperative morbidity in the morbidly obese parturient woman: Supraumbilical and low transverse abdominal approaches
Objective: Our purpose was to determine the differences in postoperative morbidity in obese women who had a supraumbilical or a Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery. Study Design: A case-control retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were at >150% ideal body weight when unde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2000-05, Vol.182 (5), p.1033-1035 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Our purpose was to determine the differences in postoperative morbidity in obese women who had a supraumbilical or a Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery.
Study Design: A case-control retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were at >150% ideal body weight when undergoing cesarean delivery between 1989 and 1995 by means of either a supraumbilical or a Pfannenstiel incision. Patients were excluded if medical records were unavailable. A total of 15 women who had a supraumbilical incision and 54 who had a low transverse incision were included in the analysis. Antenatal complications were examined, as were age, weight, and training level of the surgeon. Postoperative complications were then compared.
Results: The groups were similar in age and antepartum complications. However, mean weight and percentage of ideal body weight in the supraumbilical group were both higher (
P < .00001 and
P < .0001, respectively), with the supraumbilical group 83 lb heavier on average. No significant differences were seen in any postoperative complication.
Conclusion: Postoperative morbidity in morbidly obese women undergoing cesarean delivery does not differ between a supraumbilical approach and the low transverse abdominal incision. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1033-5.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1067/mob.2000.105400 |