Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening
Background and Objectives Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vox sanguinis 2001-07, Vol.81 (1), p.12-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Vox sanguinis |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Cuijpers, H. T. M. Molijn, M. H. J. Bos, H. J. Peeters, A. P. W. Van Der Poel, C. L. Lelie, P. N. |
description | Background and Objectives
Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of the HCV NAT method and the quality control results obtained during 6 months of routine screening.
Materials and Methods
Plasma minipools of 48 donations were prepared on a Tecan Genesis robot. HCV RNA was isolated from 2 ml of plasma by using the NucliSens Extractor and amplified and detected with the Cobas HCV Amplicor 2.0 test system. For validation of the test system the laboratories used viral quality control (VQC) reagents of CLB.
Results
Initial robustness experiments demonstrated consistent detection of PeliSpy HCV RNA samples of 140 genome equivalents/ml (geq/ml) in each station of the installed Nuclisens Extractors. Further ‘stress’ tests with a highly viraemic sample of ≈ 5·106 geq/ml did not contaminate negative samples processed on all Extractor stations in subsequent runs. In the validation period prior to July 1999, 1021 pools were tested with the following performance characteristics: 0·1%, initially false reactive; 0·89%, failure of internal control detection; 0·97%, no eluate generated by the Extractor; and 100% reactivity of the PeliSpy 140 geq/ml control in 176 Extractor runs and a 98% reactivity rate of the PeliSpy 38 geq/ml control in 102 test runs. By testing the PeliCheck HCV RNA genotype 1 dilution panels 49 times, an overall 95% detection limit of 30 geq/ml (≈ 8 IU/ml) and a 50% detection limit of 5 geq/ml was found by the four laboratories. In the first 6 months of routine screening, the minimum requirement for invalid results (2%) was exceeded with some batches of silica and NucliSens Extractor cartridges. From November 1999 to February 2000, the manufacturer (Organon Teknika) improved the protocol for silica absorption of the Nuclisens Extractor – the cartridge design as well as the software of the Extractor. During the next 6 months of observation in 2000, the percentages of false initial reactives and invalids were 0·05% and 1·4%, respectively, in 8962 pools tested. Of these invalid results, 0·74% and 0·66% were caused by Extractor failure and negative internal control signals, respectively. The PeliSpy HCV RNA ‘stop or go’ run control of 140 geq/ml was 100% reactive, but invalid in 16/1375 (1·2%) of cases. The PeliSpy run control |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00055.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71120014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71120014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-2a97f9211ce856a770bb7c8e0ddf785bff1744435748ccd60017c4817acbc66e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdGO1CAUhhujccfVVzDERO9agUKhiTebcV1NJrsXq6vxhlBKdxgpjNC6Mz6nDySdTnYTr7zhkMP3_xz4swwgWCBIqrebAhFc5pCkBoYQFRBCSovdo2xxf_A4W0BIcF5DyE6yZzFuEsQxp0-zE4QonphF9udGWtPKwXgHfAeGtQaXo7LmWrsIzndDkGrwARgHlO8b42byzgzrA7vW29QZTARL8MuEMVXfyAjO-q01KglxAYGMUe4ni86PAVjZ-CCTqdFxah6u1GkNVro2gnEw1vw27ha4NIg2CkhlWiAnx86oeYBBq7Xz1t_uk2kAjfW-BVEFrV1SPs-edNJG_eJYT7MvH84_Lz_mq6uLT8uzVa4IrWmOZc26GiOkNKeVZAw2DVNcw7btGKdN1yFGCCkpI1yptkofzRThiEnVqKrS5Wn2ZvbdBv9z1HEQvYlK2_QQ7ccoGEJTOiSBr_4BN-krXJpNYFwSzhnCCeIzpIKPMehObIPpZdgLBMUUu9iIKV0xJScmY3GIXeyS9OXRf2x63T4Ijzkn4PURkFFJ2wXplIkPHIEVq1mZuHczd2es3v_3AOLm6lvaJHk-y00c9O5eLsMPUbGSUfH18kLw7_j96pohQcu_cKXbBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223488712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Cuijpers, H. T. M. ; Molijn, M. H. J. ; Bos, H. J. ; Peeters, A. P. W. ; Van Der Poel, C. L. ; Lelie, P. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuijpers, H. T. M. ; Molijn, M. H. J. ; Bos, H. J. ; Peeters, A. P. W. ; Van Der Poel, C. L. ; Lelie, P. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives
Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of the HCV NAT method and the quality control results obtained during 6 months of routine screening.
Materials and Methods
Plasma minipools of 48 donations were prepared on a Tecan Genesis robot. HCV RNA was isolated from 2 ml of plasma by using the NucliSens Extractor and amplified and detected with the Cobas HCV Amplicor 2.0 test system. For validation of the test system the laboratories used viral quality control (VQC) reagents of CLB.
Results
Initial robustness experiments demonstrated consistent detection of PeliSpy HCV RNA samples of 140 genome equivalents/ml (geq/ml) in each station of the installed Nuclisens Extractors. Further ‘stress’ tests with a highly viraemic sample of ≈ 5·106 geq/ml did not contaminate negative samples processed on all Extractor stations in subsequent runs. In the validation period prior to July 1999, 1021 pools were tested with the following performance characteristics: 0·1%, initially false reactive; 0·89%, failure of internal control detection; 0·97%, no eluate generated by the Extractor; and 100% reactivity of the PeliSpy 140 geq/ml control in 176 Extractor runs and a 98% reactivity rate of the PeliSpy 38 geq/ml control in 102 test runs. By testing the PeliCheck HCV RNA genotype 1 dilution panels 49 times, an overall 95% detection limit of 30 geq/ml (≈ 8 IU/ml) and a 50% detection limit of 5 geq/ml was found by the four laboratories. In the first 6 months of routine screening, the minimum requirement for invalid results (2%) was exceeded with some batches of silica and NucliSens Extractor cartridges. From November 1999 to February 2000, the manufacturer (Organon Teknika) improved the protocol for silica absorption of the Nuclisens Extractor – the cartridge design as well as the software of the Extractor. During the next 6 months of observation in 2000, the percentages of false initial reactives and invalids were 0·05% and 1·4%, respectively, in 8962 pools tested. Of these invalid results, 0·74% and 0·66% were caused by Extractor failure and negative internal control signals, respectively. The PeliSpy HCV RNA ‘stop or go’ run control of 140 geq/ml was 100% reactive, but invalid in 16/1375 (1·2%) of cases. The PeliSpy run control of 38 geq/ml for monitoring sensitivity of reagent batches was reactive in 95% of 123 samples tested.
Conclusions
Each of the four HCV NAT laboratories in the Netherlands have achieved similar detection limits that are well below the sensitivity requirements of the regulatory bodies. After improvement of the NucliSens Extractor procedure, the robustness of the test system has proved to be acceptable for routine screening and timely release of all labile blood components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00055.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11520410</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VOSAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>95% Detection limit ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis ; Equipment Failure ; False Negative Reactions ; HCV NAT method ; Hepacivirus - genetics ; Hepatitis C ; Hepatitis C - diagnosis ; Humans ; Mass Screening - instrumentation ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - standards ; Medical sciences ; Netherlands ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - instrumentation ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; RNA, Viral - blood ; robustness ; run control ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy ; validation</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2001-07, Vol.81 (1), p.12-20</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG Jul 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-2a97f9211ce856a770bb7c8e0ddf785bff1744435748ccd60017c4817acbc66e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-2a97f9211ce856a770bb7c8e0ddf785bff1744435748ccd60017c4817acbc66e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1423-0410.2001.00055.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1423-0410.2001.00055.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14067973$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11520410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuijpers, H. T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molijn, M. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, A. P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Poel, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelie, P. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives
Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of the HCV NAT method and the quality control results obtained during 6 months of routine screening.
Materials and Methods
Plasma minipools of 48 donations were prepared on a Tecan Genesis robot. HCV RNA was isolated from 2 ml of plasma by using the NucliSens Extractor and amplified and detected with the Cobas HCV Amplicor 2.0 test system. For validation of the test system the laboratories used viral quality control (VQC) reagents of CLB.
Results
Initial robustness experiments demonstrated consistent detection of PeliSpy HCV RNA samples of 140 genome equivalents/ml (geq/ml) in each station of the installed Nuclisens Extractors. Further ‘stress’ tests with a highly viraemic sample of ≈ 5·106 geq/ml did not contaminate negative samples processed on all Extractor stations in subsequent runs. In the validation period prior to July 1999, 1021 pools were tested with the following performance characteristics: 0·1%, initially false reactive; 0·89%, failure of internal control detection; 0·97%, no eluate generated by the Extractor; and 100% reactivity of the PeliSpy 140 geq/ml control in 176 Extractor runs and a 98% reactivity rate of the PeliSpy 38 geq/ml control in 102 test runs. By testing the PeliCheck HCV RNA genotype 1 dilution panels 49 times, an overall 95% detection limit of 30 geq/ml (≈ 8 IU/ml) and a 50% detection limit of 5 geq/ml was found by the four laboratories. In the first 6 months of routine screening, the minimum requirement for invalid results (2%) was exceeded with some batches of silica and NucliSens Extractor cartridges. From November 1999 to February 2000, the manufacturer (Organon Teknika) improved the protocol for silica absorption of the Nuclisens Extractor – the cartridge design as well as the software of the Extractor. During the next 6 months of observation in 2000, the percentages of false initial reactives and invalids were 0·05% and 1·4%, respectively, in 8962 pools tested. Of these invalid results, 0·74% and 0·66% were caused by Extractor failure and negative internal control signals, respectively. The PeliSpy HCV RNA ‘stop or go’ run control of 140 geq/ml was 100% reactive, but invalid in 16/1375 (1·2%) of cases. The PeliSpy run control of 38 geq/ml for monitoring sensitivity of reagent batches was reactive in 95% of 123 samples tested.
Conclusions
Each of the four HCV NAT laboratories in the Netherlands have achieved similar detection limits that are well below the sensitivity requirements of the regulatory bodies. After improvement of the NucliSens Extractor procedure, the robustness of the test system has proved to be acceptable for routine screening and timely release of all labile blood components.</description><subject>95% Detection limit</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>HCV NAT method</subject><subject>Hepacivirus - genetics</subject><subject>Hepatitis C</subject><subject>Hepatitis C - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RNA, Viral - blood</subject><subject>robustness</subject><subject>run control</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</subject><subject>validation</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdGO1CAUhhujccfVVzDERO9agUKhiTebcV1NJrsXq6vxhlBKdxgpjNC6Mz6nDySdTnYTr7zhkMP3_xz4swwgWCBIqrebAhFc5pCkBoYQFRBCSovdo2xxf_A4W0BIcF5DyE6yZzFuEsQxp0-zE4QonphF9udGWtPKwXgHfAeGtQaXo7LmWrsIzndDkGrwARgHlO8b42byzgzrA7vW29QZTARL8MuEMVXfyAjO-q01KglxAYGMUe4ni86PAVjZ-CCTqdFxah6u1GkNVro2gnEw1vw27ha4NIg2CkhlWiAnx86oeYBBq7Xz1t_uk2kAjfW-BVEFrV1SPs-edNJG_eJYT7MvH84_Lz_mq6uLT8uzVa4IrWmOZc26GiOkNKeVZAw2DVNcw7btGKdN1yFGCCkpI1yptkofzRThiEnVqKrS5Wn2ZvbdBv9z1HEQvYlK2_QQ7ccoGEJTOiSBr_4BN-krXJpNYFwSzhnCCeIzpIKPMehObIPpZdgLBMUUu9iIKV0xJScmY3GIXeyS9OXRf2x63T4Ijzkn4PURkFFJ2wXplIkPHIEVq1mZuHczd2es3v_3AOLm6lvaJHk-y00c9O5eLsMPUbGSUfH18kLw7_j96pohQcu_cKXbBQ</recordid><startdate>200107</startdate><enddate>200107</enddate><creator>Cuijpers, H. T. M.</creator><creator>Molijn, M. H. J.</creator><creator>Bos, H. J.</creator><creator>Peeters, A. P. W.</creator><creator>Van Der Poel, C. L.</creator><creator>Lelie, P. N.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200107</creationdate><title>Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening</title><author>Cuijpers, H. T. M. ; Molijn, M. H. J. ; Bos, H. J. ; Peeters, A. P. W. ; Van Der Poel, C. L. ; Lelie, P. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-2a97f9211ce856a770bb7c8e0ddf785bff1744435748ccd60017c4817acbc66e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>95% Detection limit</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>HCV NAT method</topic><topic>Hepacivirus - genetics</topic><topic>Hepatitis C</topic><topic>Hepatitis C - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RNA, Viral - blood</topic><topic>robustness</topic><topic>run control</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</topic><topic>validation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuijpers, H. T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molijn, M. H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, H. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeters, A. P. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Poel, C. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelie, P. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuijpers, H. T. M.</au><au>Molijn, M. H. J.</au><au>Bos, H. J.</au><au>Peeters, A. P. W.</au><au>Van Der Poel, C. L.</au><au>Lelie, P. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2001-07</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>12-20</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><coden>VOSAAD</coden><abstract>Background and Objectives
Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of the HCV NAT method and the quality control results obtained during 6 months of routine screening.
Materials and Methods
Plasma minipools of 48 donations were prepared on a Tecan Genesis robot. HCV RNA was isolated from 2 ml of plasma by using the NucliSens Extractor and amplified and detected with the Cobas HCV Amplicor 2.0 test system. For validation of the test system the laboratories used viral quality control (VQC) reagents of CLB.
Results
Initial robustness experiments demonstrated consistent detection of PeliSpy HCV RNA samples of 140 genome equivalents/ml (geq/ml) in each station of the installed Nuclisens Extractors. Further ‘stress’ tests with a highly viraemic sample of ≈ 5·106 geq/ml did not contaminate negative samples processed on all Extractor stations in subsequent runs. In the validation period prior to July 1999, 1021 pools were tested with the following performance characteristics: 0·1%, initially false reactive; 0·89%, failure of internal control detection; 0·97%, no eluate generated by the Extractor; and 100% reactivity of the PeliSpy 140 geq/ml control in 176 Extractor runs and a 98% reactivity rate of the PeliSpy 38 geq/ml control in 102 test runs. By testing the PeliCheck HCV RNA genotype 1 dilution panels 49 times, an overall 95% detection limit of 30 geq/ml (≈ 8 IU/ml) and a 50% detection limit of 5 geq/ml was found by the four laboratories. In the first 6 months of routine screening, the minimum requirement for invalid results (2%) was exceeded with some batches of silica and NucliSens Extractor cartridges. From November 1999 to February 2000, the manufacturer (Organon Teknika) improved the protocol for silica absorption of the Nuclisens Extractor – the cartridge design as well as the software of the Extractor. During the next 6 months of observation in 2000, the percentages of false initial reactives and invalids were 0·05% and 1·4%, respectively, in 8962 pools tested. Of these invalid results, 0·74% and 0·66% were caused by Extractor failure and negative internal control signals, respectively. The PeliSpy HCV RNA ‘stop or go’ run control of 140 geq/ml was 100% reactive, but invalid in 16/1375 (1·2%) of cases. The PeliSpy run control of 38 geq/ml for monitoring sensitivity of reagent batches was reactive in 95% of 123 samples tested.
Conclusions
Each of the four HCV NAT laboratories in the Netherlands have achieved similar detection limits that are well below the sensitivity requirements of the regulatory bodies. After improvement of the NucliSens Extractor procedure, the robustness of the test system has proved to be acceptable for routine screening and timely release of all labile blood components.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>11520410</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00055.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-9007 |
ispartof | Vox sanguinis, 2001-07, Vol.81 (1), p.12-20 |
issn | 0042-9007 1423-0410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_71120014 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | 95% Detection limit Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis Equipment Failure False Negative Reactions HCV NAT method Hepacivirus - genetics Hepatitis C Hepatitis C - diagnosis Humans Mass Screening - instrumentation Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - standards Medical sciences Netherlands Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - instrumentation Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - standards Reproducibility of Results RNA, Viral - blood robustness run control Sensitivity and Specificity Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy validation |
title | Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T02%3A44%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20NucliSens%20Extractor%20in%20combination%20with%20the%20hepatitis%20C%20virus%20Cobas%20Amplicor%202.0%20assay%20in%20four%20laboratories%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20utilizing%20nucleic%20acid%20amplification%20technology%20for%20blood%20screening&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Cuijpers,%20H.%20T.%20M.&rft.date=2001-07&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=12-20&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft.coden=VOSAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1423-0410.2001.00055.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71120014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223488712&rft_id=info:pmid/11520410&rfr_iscdi=true |