The resistance of a four- and eight-strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing: an experimental study of repaired canine flexor tendons after 10 days of in vivo healing

There is a high incidence of gap formation at the repair site following tendon repair. Our goal was to determine the resistance of a 4- and an 8-strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing. We hypothesized that the 8-strand repair would sustain higher force levels at the onset of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2000-05, Vol.25 (3), p.489-498
Hauptverfasser: Dinopoulos, Haralambos T., Boyer, Martin I., Burns, Meghan E., Gelberman, Richard H., Silva, Matthew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There is a high incidence of gap formation at the repair site following tendon repair. Our goal was to determine the resistance of a 4- and an 8-strand suture technique to gap formation during tensile testing. We hypothesized that the 8-strand repair would sustain higher force levels at the onset of 1- and 3-mm gaps than the 4- strand repair. Twenty-two canine flexor tendons were transected, repaired, and tested to failure after 10 days of in vivo healing. Tests were recorded using a 60-Hz video system that allowed frame-by-frame playback for assessment of gap formation. The 8-strand repairs sustained 80% higher force at a gap of 1 mm than the 4-strand repairs (average force, 70 vs 39 N), but the force sustained at a gap of 3 mm did not differ between groups (35 N for both groups). For both repair types, a 1-mm gap typically occurred near the point of ultimate (maximum) force while a 3-mm gap occurred after the ultimate force. We conclude that the 8-strand repair is significantly more resistant to initial gapping during ex vivo tensile testing than the 4-strand repair but that the two repairs are equally susceptible to rupture if a gap of 3 mm or greater forms. (J Hand Surg 2000;25A:489–498. Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for the Surgery of the Hand.)
ISSN:0363-5023
1531-6564
DOI:10.1053/jhsu.2000.6456