Comparison of the biomechanics and histology of two soft-tissue fixators composed of bioabsorbable copolymers

The purpose of this study was to assess the dynamic in vitro and in vivo characteristics of two different bioabsorbable copolymer soft‐tissue fixation devices and to determine their efficacy in reattaching soft tissue to bone. Suretac® fixators (Smith & Nephew/Acufex MicroSurgical Inc., Northwood, MA), made of polyglyconate (2:1 glycolic acid:trimethylene carbonate), and Pop Rivets® (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN), made of LactoSorb® (82% poly L‐lactic acid, 18% polyglycolic acid), were anchored into synthetic bone, and their pull‐out strengths were evaluated. The devices were also evaluated with the use of an in vivo goat model in which the medial collateral ligament (MCL) was elevated from the tibia and directly reattached. In the in vitro biomechanical study, the Suretac® fixators had negligible strength remaining by four weeks, whereas the Pop Rivets® retained 50% of their strength at 4 weeks, 20% at 8 weeks, and negligible strength at 12 weeks. The in vivo strength of MCL repairs affected by each implant was not statistically different at any of the time points. Histologically, both implants were absorbed by 52 weeks, and there was no appreciable adverse tissue response. In conclusion, both copolymer fixators were found to be biocompatible. The Pop Rivet® fixators demonstrated in vivo performance comparable to the Suretac® fixators, although the Pop Rivets® retained strength longer in vitro. Our results suggest that both devices provide adequate strength of fixation before degrading to allow the healing soft tissues to reach or surpass their native strength. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 58: 486–495, 2001