A minimum 5.0 ml of sputum improves the sensitivity of acid-fast smear for Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) by sputum smear supports treatment decisions with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), but smear sensitivity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is only approximately 45 to 75%. In an effort to increase sensitivity, smears were prepared using a minimum sputum volume of 5.0 ml...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2000-05, Vol.161 (5), p.1559-1562
Hauptverfasser: Warren, J R, Bhattacharya, M, De Almeida, K N, Trakas, K, Peterson, L R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) by sputum smear supports treatment decisions with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), but smear sensitivity for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is only approximately 45 to 75%. In an effort to increase sensitivity, smears were prepared using a minimum sputum volume of 5.0 ml. Sensitivity of smears during a 39-mo period (n = 1,849) using >/= 5.0 ml of sputum was 92. 0%, significantly greater (p < 0.001) than a sensitivity of 72.5% in a previous 24-mo period (n = 3,486) when all specimens were processed regardless of volume. All new cases of TB (n = 18) were smear-positive with >/= 5.0 ml of sputum before treatment, and all were receiving antituberculosis drugs at hospital discharge. In contrast, significantly fewer new cases of TB (14 of 26, p = 0.002) were positive before treatment when smears were prepared using sputum of any volume, and significantly fewer of these new TB cases (18 of 26, p = 0.03) were receiving treatment at hospital discharge. The eight cases without treatment were smear-negative. These results indicate that acid-fast smear using >/= 5.0 ml of sputum increases sensitivity for M. tuberculosis and accelerates treatment of TB.
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9908063