Can Quality Improvement Programs for Depression in Primary Care Address Patient Preferences for Treatment?

Background. Depression is common in primary care, but rates of adequate care are low. Little is known about the role of patient treatment preferences in encouraging entry into care. Objectives. To examine whether a primary care based depression quality improvement (QI) intervention designed to accom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2001-09, Vol.39 (9), p.934-944
Hauptverfasser: Dwight-Johnson, Megan, Unutzer, Jurgen, Sherbourne, Cathy, Tang, Lingqi, Wells, Kenneth B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Depression is common in primary care, but rates of adequate care are low. Little is known about the role of patient treatment preferences in encouraging entry into care. Objectives. To examine whether a primary care based depression quality improvement (QI) intervention designed to accommodate patient and provider treatment choice increases the likelihood that patients enter depression treatment and receive preferred treatment. Methods. In 46 primary care clinics, patients with current depressive symptoms and either lifetime or current depressive disorder were identified through screening. Treatment preferences, patient characteristics, and use of depression treatments were assessed at baseline and 6 months by patient self-report. Matched clinics were randomized to usual care (UC) or 1 of 2 QI interventions. Data were analyzed using logistic regression models. Results. For patients not in care at baseline, the QI interventions increased rates of entry into depression treatment compared with usual care (adjusted percentage: 50.0% ± 5.3 and 33.0% ± 4.9 for interventions vs. 15.9% ± 3.6 for usual care; F = 12.973, P
ISSN:0025-7079
1537-1948
DOI:10.1097/00005650-200109000-00004