Interpretative reporting and selective antimicrobial susceptibility release in non-critical microbiology results

The action taken in response to 169 positive sputum, urine and wound culture reports was examined. All reports included interpretative comments. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were released in 29 (17%). Therapy was significantly more likely to be started or altered in response to reports where susce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2000-05, Vol.45 (5), p.705-708
Hauptverfasser: Cunney, Robert, Aziz, Hiba Abdel, Schubert, Darlene, McNamara, Eleanor, Smyth, Edmond
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The action taken in response to 169 positive sputum, urine and wound culture reports was examined. All reports included interpretative comments. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were released in 29 (17%). Therapy was significantly more likely to be started or altered in response to reports where susceptibilities were released (13 of 29, 45%) versus those without susceptibility release (31 of 140, 22%). Susceptibility release did not influence the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. The clinical microbiology team was contacted for therapeutic advice in response to 32 (19%) reports. Of the remaining 137 reports, therapy was started or altered in response to 30 (22%) reports, but was considered appropriate in only seven (22%) of these.
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/45.5.705