Efficacy and safety of oral granisetron versus i.v. granisetron in patients undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell and bone marrow transplantation

This randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral versus i.v. granisetron, both in combination with non-5-HT3 antiemetics, in preventing emesis caused by high-dose chemotherapy. Fifty-one patients who underwent peripheral blood progenitor cell transplanta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anti-cancer drugs 2000-02, Vol.11 (2), p.137-142
Hauptverfasser: Abang, Anthony M, Takemoto, Marc H, Pham, Trinh, Mandanas, Romeo A, Roy, Vivek, Selby, George B, Carter, Thomas H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral versus i.v. granisetron, both in combination with non-5-HT3 antiemetics, in preventing emesis caused by high-dose chemotherapy. Fifty-one patients who underwent peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) were evaluated. Efficacy was assessed by the number of emetic episodes during the worst 24 h period. A complete response (CR) was defined as no vomiting, partial response (PR) as less than three emetic episodes and failure as three or more emetic episodes. Patients who received oral granisetron experienced significantly (p
ISSN:0959-4973
1473-5741
DOI:10.1097/00001813-200002000-00011