A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in three different in vitro fertilization protocols

Objective: To compare the following IVF protocols: a short protocol and long protocols starting on day 2 or day 21. All protocols used recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: An assisted reproduction unit at a university center. Patient(s): Pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2000-05, Vol.73 (5), p.908-912
Hauptverfasser: Ravhon, Amir, Lawrie, Henrietta, Ellenbogen, Adrian, Lavery, Stuart, Trew, Geoffrey, Winston, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To compare the following IVF protocols: a short protocol and long protocols starting on day 2 or day 21. All protocols used recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: An assisted reproduction unit at a university center. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF (n = 150) were treated according to one of the three treatment protocols allocated by a random method. Intervention(s): All patients used buserelin acetate and rFSH. Patients began the long protocol on day 2 (group 1) or day 21 (group 2) of the cycle. Patients in group 3 began the short protocol on day 2 of the cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian response, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (PRs). Result(s): Patients treated with the short protocol (group 3) were stimulated in a shorter time, required less rFSH, and achieved higher E 2 levels. The numbers of follicles, oocytes, and embryos were similar in all three groups. The implantation rates were similar in groups 1 and 2 (11.8% and 13.3%, respectively), and both were higher than in group 3 (4.1%). Clinical PRs per oocytes retrieved were 19.6%, 18.6%, and 8.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusion(s): The implantation rate was significantly higher with the long protocols than with the short protocol, with a tendency for a higher PR as well.
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00469-6